$_SecureScope악용 확인 · 악용 확률 · 한국어 권고
● CISA KEV 미등재

CVE-2026-87858

Temporal Server decided whether a Workflow completion callback was internal by reading a caller-supplied HTTP header. An authenticated caller holding only write permission in a single namespace could …

높음7.2악용 확률 0.78%CWE-807공개 2026-09-21
7.228CWE-807

📌 이 취약점에 대해 확인된 사실

전부 발행처가 발표한 값입니다. 우리가 계산하거나 판단한 숫자는 하나도 없습니다.

악용 여부

CISA KEV 목록에 없습니다. 악용이 없다는 증명이 아니라, 미국 정부가 악용을 확인해 등재한 적이 없다는 뜻입니다.

심각도 (발행처 발표값)

높음7.2

CVSS 버전4.0
평가 기관security@temporal.io

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

악용 확률 (EPSS)

0.8%

30일 내 악용 확률0.78%
전체 CVE 중 백분위54.0%
기준일2026-09-25

🇰🇷 한국어 공식 권고

KISA 보호나라 권고문 본문에서 이 CVE 번호가 발견된 문서입니다.

전체 권고 ›
이 CVE 를 다룬 KISA 보호나라 권고를 아직 찾지 못했습니다. 권고가 없다는 확증은 아닙니다 — 우리는 RSS 로 공개된 최근 공지만 수집합니다.

📄 원문 그대로

아래 문장은 전부 발행처가 쓴 것입니다. 번역하지 않습니다 — 보안 문서의 오역은 조치를 바꿉니다.

취약점 설명 (NVD)

Temporal Server decided whether a Workflow completion callback was internal by reading a caller-supplied HTTP header. An authenticated caller holding only write permission in a single namespace could attach a completion callback whose URL host matched the configured callback address allowlist, whose URL path was any Temporal HTTP API route, and whose header map contained a non-empty header named source. When the History service delivered that callback, the non-empty source header caused it to re-target the request at the local frontend client and rewrite only the scheme and host, preserving the caller's path, query, and request body. Where an internal frontend is deployed with its HTTP API enabled, that client resolves to the internal frontend, which authorizes every request as a system administrator without requiring authentication information. The result is that the server performs an attacker-chosen state-changing HTTP POST against its own administrative API on the caller's behalf, in namespaces where the caller has no permission. The caller never needs network access to the internal frontend, because the History service makes the request. Confirmed effects include terminating Workflows in other namespaces, registering namespaces, modifying another namespace's configuration, and deleting another namespace and its Workflows. The affected routing logic is present in both the HSM and CHASM callback delivery implementations. This description and the CVSS score in this record describe releases 1.30.0 and later, where any non-empty source header is sufficient. Releases 1.25.0 through 1.29.7 are affected by a narrower form of the same defect in which the header must exactly match a configured cluster ID, a UUID that a namespace-scoped caller cannot read through the API. The consequence once that match occurs is the same, but the attack is materially harder and scores lower. To determine whether a deployment is affected, check two settings together: the static Server configuration for a non-zero services.internal-frontend.rpc.httpPort, and the effective per-namespace dynamic configuration value of component.callbacks.allowedAddresses. A deployment is exposed only when an internal frontend is deployed with a non-zero HTTP port, at least one allowlist rule admits a host, and authorization is enabled. The allowlist is empty by default, which denies all external callback URLs, and the stock static topology does not include an internal frontend. Note that a failed attach returns the error 'invalid url: url does not match any configured callback address', which proves only that one tested URL did not match and does not prove the effective allowlist is empty. To look for callbacks already attached, use DescribeWorkflowExecution, which returns callback information for a Workflow's registered completion callbacks. Operators should be aware of a gap when searching for evidence of delivery: the frontend HTTP API server records the request method and URL at debug level only, so at default log levels a delivered request is not written to the internal frontend's logs, and the absence of such log entries is not evidence that the issue was not exploited.

약점 유형(CWE):CWE-807

참조 문서 6건 · NVD 분석 상태 Awaiting Analysis · 수집 2026-09-23

참고

이 취약점은 CISA KEV 에 등재되지 않아 CISA 원문이 없습니다. 영향 범위와 패치 버전은 제품 버전·구성에 따라 다르므로 반드시 공급사 공식 권고와 NVD 원문의 참조 링크를 확인하세요.

악용 확률 변화

우리가 매일 저장한 EPSS 스냅샷입니다. 원본은 전날 값만 주므로, 이 표는 수집을 시작한 이후만 보여줍니다.

기준일확률백분위
2026-09-250.78%54.0%
2026-09-240.78%54.0%
2026-09-230.43%36.7%
2026-09-220.43%36.7%
이 페이지는 조치 지시가 아닙니다. 영향 범위와 패치 버전은 제품·구성에 따라 다르므로, 반드시 공급사 공식 권고와 NVD 원문의 참조 링크를 확인하세요.